- Offer Submitted
-
Contingent Offer Accepted
-
Contingency Removed
-
Home Inspection
-
Fixes Requested
-
Internet Install IssuesBefore move‑in, we discovered that the fiber line terminated in the garage and then looped the single in‑wall Ethernet drop back outside, leaving indoor‑rated cable exposed to the weather. CBH said this was the ISP’s problem, but the ISP tech showed that CBH’s mis‑routed drop left them no choice. The tech rerouted the cable properly, keeping all wiring indoors, at no extra cost. Issue resolved, although most homes in the neighborhood appear to share the same CBH wiring oversight.
-
New Home OrientationThe new‑home orientation was generally positive. Staff were friendly and noted each item on our inspection list, but the process felt rushed. Several issues they agreed to correct remained unresolved when we reinspected the home in 2025. Recommendation: do not sign the orientation paperwork until you have walked the checklist with the team and confirmed each item has been fixed. There were so many outstanding items that it was difficult to keep track of them all without a detailed checklist.
-
Finalized Home Purchase
-
Moved In
-
Whole Home Air FilterAfter moving in, we inspected the HVAC fresh‑air system and discovered the intake only had a minimal filter. Because Boise’s wildfire season can bring heavy smoke, we asked CBH’s HVAC subsidiary to install a whole‑home filter to clean the incoming outdoor air. The crew did quality work at a fair price and the new filter has performed well. We still plan to add a higher‑grade pre‑filter directly after the fresh‑air intake, since unfiltered air can still get in under the current design.
-
Warranty Claim - ElectricalSince moving in, we’ve experienced ongoing flickering of ceiling lights throughout both floors. The issue has persisted for months without resolution. On July 18, 2024, we submitted a warranty claim to CBH Homes requesting an inspection and fix.
-
Warranty Claim - Electrical CompletedCBH Homes addressed the persistent flickering issue by replacing several ceiling light bulbs. During the service visit, a technician suggested that “dirty energy” being pushed back through the grid might be contributing to the problem, a theory that adds a conspiratorial twist to the situation. It’s worth noting that the home’s lighting fixtures predominantly use low-cost LED bulbs, which are known to have shorter lifespans due to substandard components like low-quality capacitors, making them more susceptible to flickering and early failure. So, while the “dirty energy” explanation adds intrigue, the root cause likely lies in the economical lighting choices.
-
Warranty Claim - One Year KickoffFiled the formal one‑year workmanship warranty claim, listing many items that needed attention after living in the home for twelve months. This is the initial submission; any additional issues uncovered during follow‑up inspections, investigations, or third‑party evaluations will be added to this claim. The initial list included:
- Carpet defects: ridges, seams
- Upstairs floors squeak, flex
- Drywall nail pops
- Fresh‑air intake disconnected
- Windows difficult to open
- First‑floor subfloor dips
- Molding gaps, misaligned
- Ceiling‑corner nail pops
- Garage slab cracks
- Excess caulk on trim
- Tack‑strip nails exposed
- Ceiling‑wall cracks forming
-
Home Inspection - One YearBrought back the same independent inspector who performed our pre‑closing inspection to do a one‑year follow‑up before the workmanship warranty expired. The inspection confirmed several items still unresolved and documented new issues to include in our next round of warranty claims.
-
Warranty Claim - Initial InspectionCBH conducted their first on‑site inspection and agreed that several upstairs and downstairs floor areas showed unacceptable defects. They suggested the subfloor may not have been sanded properly and said specialists would be scheduled to investigate further.
Other issues acknowledged: squeaking floors, tight windows, loose pony walls on the stairs, and warped or gapped doors. The crew was friendly but offered patch cement work in the garage only; most items were deferred pending additional appointments.
-
Warranty CallWe tried calling both CBH and the warranty company to let them know to hold off on the scheduled carpet inspection the next day, as the flooring issues seemed more involved than just the carpet. Neither picked up their phones or responded to our calls.
-
Warranty Claim - Carpet InspectionDespite our attempts to reach out the day before, the CBH carpet inspector still arrived as scheduled. He identified multiple defects and acknowledged issues with the initial carpet installation. To properly address the poor workmanship, he explained that nearly all of the upstairs carpet would need to be replaced, as the linear design makes it impossible to match replacement sections with the existing pattern.
-
CBH CallDuring the carpet inspection visit, we discussed that there were likely more significant issues with the subfloor that needed to be addressed before any carpet work could begin. The inspector advised us to call his office, who acknowledged the challenge and provided us with CBH’s main office contact info for further clarification. We called the CBH warranty office, left a message, but never received a response.
-
Launch of CBH Reviews
-
Warranty Submission EmailSent an email to the warranty coordinator with a video (filmed April 27, 2025) highlighting ongoing flooring and window/door issues, and asked for confirmation that the link was accessible. Reiterated that all warranty claims will continue through this email thread and the builder’s portal. We let them know we are launching CBHReviews.com to publicly document our experience, clarifying it won’t change how we submit claims. We also reminded them that several “completed” window and door items remain unresolved and promised more photos/videos before the one‑year deadline.
-
Warranty Submission EmailSent a follow‑up email attaching two PDFs: additional photos documenting floor‑level issues and a warranty claim for the disconnected fresh‑air intake, which we temporarily fixed due to immediate health concerns.
-
Warranty Submission EmailSent an email attaching a document outlining finish defects (drywall, paint, trim) and a video (https://youtu.be/cfJz3YfAIV8) showing additional squeaking and hollow/clicking LVP in the kitchen and dining room.
-
Warranty Submission Response EmailReceived an email from the warranty coordinator stating they couldn’t open the files we sent and asking for JPEGs or PDFs instead, despite the fact that we had already attached PDFs and only included a YouTube link for video evidence. This contradicted our earlier phone call, where they confirmed YouTube links were acceptable and said it was easier to keep everything in the original email thread because the warranty portal is limited.
-
Warranty Submission EmailSent an email attaching documentation of exterior and crawl‑space defects and noted that more images would follow later in the day to capture additional exterior issues.
-
Warranty Submission Response EmailReceived a brief acknowledgment from the warranty coordinator saying they would forward our report to the builder. We replied, after several unanswered calls, asking what files they couldn’t open and reminding her we had only sent PDFs and a YouTube link they previously approved, while requesting confirmation that all materials were received.
-
Warranty Update EmailReceived the warranty team’s status list for all reported issues. We replied the same day, still waiting on the builder, to stress that the upstairs squeaks also create vibrations strong enough to rattle nearby furniture and décor, and asked that this detail be added to the existing carpentry framing claim.
-
Warranty Update Email - SodReceived an email from the warranty team stating the builder had approved replacement of part of the rear sod as a “one‑time courtesy” and scheduled the work for next week, even though we hadn’t submitted any sod‑related request. We replied to clarify that no sod replacement is needed.
Despite repeatedly flagging safety concerns, potential health hazards, and possible code violations, this response raises doubts about whether the builder is taking those issues seriously.
-
Schedule Request - Builder Visit ProposalReceived an email from Front Line Warranty Service requesting our availability on May 29 at 9:00 AM for the builder’s team to address eleven listed items (including flooring dips/squeaks, drywall pops/cracks, roof nails/flashing, a loose pony wall, and several door/window adjustments).
-
Availability & Plan RequestWe thanked the warranty team and, before confirming dates, requested a detailed plan, estimated timelines, and any access or prep requirements (including whether we would need to vacate areas). We noted we were awaiting a structural engineering report expected by Friday, May 23.
-
Builder Update - Flooring Duration & DatesFront Line Warranty Service shared a builder update indicating flooring work would likely take two days, with an appliance move crew arriving around 8:00 AM and the flooring team around 9:00 AM. They asked if May 29 and May 30 worked for scheduling.
-
Availability Update & Scope RequestWe confirmed we were not available on May 29–30, reiterated we were awaiting the structural engineering report, and again requested comprehensive scope and timeline details before confirming new dates.
-
Warranty AcknowledgmentFront Line Warranty Service acknowledged our message and said they would notify the builder and follow up when there was an update.
-
Structural Report ReceivedWe confirmed receipt of the structural engineering report and noted we would review it with the engineer into the following week before releasing it to the builder.
-
Supplemental Claim with Engineering ReportSubmitted a supplemental claim with the structural engineer’s letter attached. We requested a coverage determination and a written remediation and restoration plan with schedule/notice, along with site-access and progress documentation. The letter noted observations including missing bottom‑chord bracing at kitchen floor trusses, examples of floor deflection beyond common serviceability limits, localized subfloor delamination at fastener lines (associated squeaks/bounce), and an assembly at effective capacity contributing to noticeable floor flexibility.
-
Warranty AcknowledgmentFront Line Warranty Service acknowledged receipt of our supplemental claim and said they would notify the builder and follow up.
-
Builder Reassessment ProposedFront Line Warranty Service relayed a builder update stating the floor assembly (24” O/C with 23/32” OSB, glued and nailed) meets 2018 IRC. They proposed a reassessment with the original framer and asked if Wednesday, July 16 around 3:00 PM worked.
-
Reassessment Confirmed & Clarification RequestedWe confirmed the July 16 at 3:00 PM reassessment time. We also clarified that baseline IRC compliance was not in dispute and asked how the builder planned to bring the specific items (bracing, deflection, localized delamination, floor rigidity) into full code/manufacturer compliance.
-
Warranty AcknowledgmentFront Line Warranty Service acknowledged our confirmation and said they would inform the builder of our availability and the additional information we provided.
-
Builder Site Visit - Level ChecksThe builder’s team conducted an on‑site visit around 3:00 PM. As later documented in our 7/17 recap, several areas appeared outside the builder’s leveling standards; the framer was not present, and the crew did not have the engineering letter during the visit. The team performed spot level checks.
-
Site Visit Recap & Next‑Steps RequestWe recapped the 7/16 visit and asked Front Line Warranty Service to distribute the structural report to the builder and framer, confirm the earliest date for a fully prepared return visit (including the framer), and clarify the repair plan for the loose stairs pony wall.
-
Scheduling Clarification from WarrantyFront Line Warranty Service acknowledged our recap and clarified that they do not schedule or facilitate the builder’s scheduling. They stated they ask that repairs be addressed within a “reasonable amount of time,” with timing determined by the builder.
-
Status Follow‑UpWe requested a status update, noting the claim originated in April and that the 7/16 visit was inconclusive. We asked what timeframe the builder considers reasonable to provide a repair strategy and to schedule a conclusive follow‑up meeting.
-
Second Follow‑UpWe sent a second follow‑up, noting it had been nearly four weeks since the visit and two weeks since the prior follow‑up without an update. We requested confirmation of the builder’s proposed strategy, a conclusive meeting, and a schedule for flooring and other items.
-
Transition to CBH Warranty PortalFront Line Warranty Service (cc: CBH Customer Care) advised that CBH Homes launched a new warranty portal and requested that all warranty submissions go through the CBH portal instead of contacting the 2‑10 team. They provided access instructions and a CBH contact for support.
-
CBH Acknowledgment - Review In ProgressCBH Homes acknowledged receipt of the claim materials and stated they are reviewing the prior visit findings and the engineering report. They indicated they would follow up with next steps as soon as possible.